Penyempitan Makna Ilal dalam Kritik Hadis: Kajian Kritis Pemikiran Hatim Al-Auni

  • Viki Junianto Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis, Ma’had Aly Hasyim Asy’ari
  • Ahmad Yusronil Haq Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis, Ma’had Aly Hasyim Asy’ari
  • Muhammad Shodiq Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis, Ma’had Aly Hasyim Asy’ari
  • M Toifur Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis, Ma’had Aly Hasyim Asy’ari
  • Ahmad Ubaidy Hasbillah Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari

Abstract

In the long history of the science of hadith criticism, it can generally be divided into two phases: the riwayah phase, also known as the mutaqadimin phase, and the post-riwayah phase, also referred to as the muta'akhirin phase. According to several Muslim scholars, including Sharif Hatim al-Auni, there has been a distortion of the scientific knowledge of hadith between these two phases. This is because the mutaqadimin phase represents the application (marhalah tatbiq) of the science of hadith, while the muta'akhkhirin phase represents the theoretical (marhalah tandhir) aspect. As a result, the theories (tandhir) of the muta'akhkhirin scholars often fail to accommodate the practical applications (tatbiq) of the scholars in the mutaqadimin phase. This research aims to explain one example of this distortion, namely in the issue of 'ilal (hidden defects) in hadith. Using library research by collecting relevant data, this study concludes that there is a distortion in the interpretation of 'illat (hidden defect). The mutaqadimin scholars had a broader definition of 'illat than the muta'akhkhirin scholars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Shodiq, Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis, Ma’had Aly Hasyim Asy’ari

 

 

 

M Toifur, Hadis dan Ilmu Hadis, Ma’had Aly Hasyim Asy’ari

Ahmad Ubaidy Hasbillah, Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Hasyim Asy’ari

 

 

 

References

ad-Dzahabi. (1995). Mizan al-I’tidal. Dar al-Ma’rifah.

Ahmad. (2001). Musnad Ahmad, tahqiq Arnauth. Muassasah ar-Risalah.

al-Asqalani, I. H. (1988). Lisan al-mizan. Dar al-Fikr.

al-Auni, S. H. (1997). Manhaj al-Muktarah li fahm al-Musthalah. Dar al-Hijrah.

al-Madini, A. (2005). Ilal al-Hadis Wa Ma’rifah al-Rijal. Dar Ibn Jauzi.

al-Malibari, H. (1996). al-Hadis al-Ma’lul: Qawaid wa Dhawabith. Dar Ibn Hazm.

Al-Bani, M. N. al-Din al-. (t.t.). Al-Silsilah al-Sahihah.

Albani, M. N. al-Din. (2001). al-Durar fi masail al-mustalah wa-al-athar: Masail Abi al-Hasan al-Misri al-Marabi (al-Tabah 1 edition). Dar al-Kharraz.

al-ʻ Asqalānī, A. ibn ʻAlī I. Ḥajar. (2001). نزهة النظر: Sharḥ Nukhbat al-fikar fī muṣṭalaḥ ahl al-athar, maʻa ḥāshiyatihā ʻIqd al-durar fī jīd Nuzhat al-naẓar. Ḍiyāʼ al-Qurʼān.

Al-Tirmidhi, A. (1989). Al-‘Ilal Al-Kabir. Beirut:‘Alim al-Kabir Maktabah al-Nahdhah al-‘Arab.

as-Syakhawi, M. (2003). Fath al-Mugist. Maktabah as-Sunnah.

at-Tirmidzi, M. (1976). Sunan Tirmidzi. Dar Kutub Al-Ilmiyah.

At-Takmil wa al-Idhah li Maqasid Kitab Ibn as-Shalah. (2022). Daru Faris.

b. Abdullah, R. (2018). Al-Mustalahat al-Hadithiyyah bayn al-Ittifaq wa al-Iftiraq.

Baghdadi, A.-K. al. (1972). Al-Kifayah fi Ilm al-Riwayah. Mesir: Mat} baâ€TM ah al-Saâ€TM adah.

Bin Hajjaj, M. (1976). Sahih Muslim. Dar Kutub Al-Ilmiyah.

Hatim, A. (2006). Ilal. Muassasah al-Jarisi.

Ido, M. I. (2015). Nash’at ’Ilm al-Mustalah wa al-Hadd al-Faasil bayn al-Mutaqaddimin wa al-Muta’akhkhirin. Dar Arwiqa.

Khoirunisa, D. H., & Firdaus, M. A. (2024). THE METHODOLOGICAL STEPS EMPLOYED BY SA’ĪD AL-MARRĪ IN IDENTIFYING THE ‘ILLAH IN AL-HADĪTH AL-GHARĪB. Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies, 5(1).

Noor, U. M. (2016). Aliran Iḥyā’Manhaj Al-Mutaqaddimīn dan Pembaharuan Wacana Kritik Hadis Moden. HADIS, 6(12), 32–43.

Purrohman, P. S. (2018). Menulis Skripsi Dengan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Metode, 18(8).

Shalah, I. (1986). Mukaddimah Ibnu Shalah. Dar al-Fikr.

Syaibah, A. (2015). Mushonnaf. Daru Kunuz.

Thawalibah, M. A. (2004). Mafhum al-Illah Inda Muhaddisin. Jurnal Manaroh, 1.

Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
Junianto, V., Haq, A., Shodiq, M., Toifur, M., & Hasbillah, A. (2024). Penyempitan Makna Ilal dalam Kritik Hadis: Kajian Kritis Pemikiran Hatim Al-Auni. Lisyabab : Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 5(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.58326/jurnallisyabab.v5i2.297

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.